Close

Author page: Nibras

HomeAuthor page: Nibras

A linear relationship was observed between FT and BPD, HC, AC, FL and CRL (P Forty-seven girls at the ten–sixteen completed months of pregnancy were employed. New mean and you can important deviation of its many years, gravidity and you may parity were thirty-two.2±4.three years, 2.3±step one.5 and you may 0.7±0.7, correspondingly. The fetal FT (mm) is plotted against the GA (weeks), as shown in Figure 2. The BPD, HC, AC, FL and CRL (mm) are plotted against FT in Figures 3–7, respectively. 001). The graphs of fetal FL to FT ratio against the FT and the GA are shown in Figures 8 and 9, respectively. The graph of the ratio of FL to AC against the GA is shown in Figure 10. The regression models for Figures 2–7 are shown within the legend for each figure and are summarized in Table 1. The Pearson coefficient is 0.992 for intraobserver correlation (P Figure 2 The graph of the estimated GA against the fetal FT.Notes: The estimated GA showed a positive linear relationship with fetal FT. The regression equation is as follows: GA (weeks) =0.335? FT (mm) +8.845. Adjusted R 2 =0.816, R=0.90, P Notes: The new Florida/Air-conditioning proportion grows towards GA within the a keen inverse relationship Figure 3 The graph of fetal BPD against the FT.Notes: The fetal BPD showed a positive linear relationship with fetal FT. The regression equation is as follows: BPD (mm) =1.243? FT (mm) +7.539. Adjusted R 2 =0.945, R=0.97, P Figure 4 The graph of fetal HC against the FT. The regression equation is as follows: HC (mm) =4.407? FT (mm) +. Adjusted R 2 =0.95, R=0.97, P Notes: This new fetal HC displayed a confident linear connection with fetal Base Figure 5 The graph of fetal AC against the FT.Notes: The fetal AC showed a positive linear relationship with fetal FT. The regression equation is as follows: AC (mm) =3.835? FT (mm) +. Adjusted R 2 =0.943, R=0.97, P Figure 6 The graph of fetal FL against the FT.Notes: The fetal FL showed a positive linear relationship with fetal FT. The regression equation is as follows: FL (mm) =1.029? FT (mm) ?3.807. Adjusted R 2 =0.937, R=0.97, P Figure 7 The graph of the fetal CRL against the fetal FT.Notes: The fetal CRL showed a positive linear relationship with fetal FT. The regression equation is as follows: CRL (mm) =4.291? FT (mm) +. Adjusted R 2 =0.798, R=0.89, P Figure 8 The fetal FL/FT ratio against the FT.Notes: The FL/FT ratio increases in an inverse relationship with the FT. The ratio approaches 0.9 when the FL is around 25 mm. R 2 =0.49, R=0.7, P Figure 9 The graph of FL/FT ratio against the estimated GA.Notes: The FL/FT ratio increases with the estimated GA in an inverse relationship and reaches 0.9 at 17 weeks gestation. R 2 =0.516, R=0.72, P Figure 10 The FL/AC ratio against the GA. The ratio reaches 0.16 beyond 15 weeks gestation. R 2 =0.704, R=0.84, P Table 1 New linear regression habits predicting fetal details with the foot length just like the predictor variableNote: The brand new fetal parameters is actually mentioned in millimeters in addition to estimated gestational ages during the months. The fetal FT showed a linear correlation with GA, BPD, HC, AC, FL and CRL between 10 and 16 weeks gestation (P

June 15, 2022 by Nibras 0 0

A linear relationship was observed between FT and BPD, HC, AC, FL and CRL...

Read more
Le Sept Coworking Space Dubai © 2017 All Rights Reserved.